I recently (in June) built a PC for a friend, installing W11 Home (Version : 10.0.26100, I believe that is v24H2) using one of my MS accounts. I then set up two local admin accounts: one for the friend and one for myself as backup. I intended, but apparently failed, to remove the MS account - it is not being used. I was not bothered about that at the time.
I removed Copilot & OneDrive, and set him up with local backup (files and imaging).
More recently I read that Bitlocker may have been installed automatically - a worrying prospect, when I have no idea what the encryption key might be. So when I was last with him I checked, and could find no sign of it - although neither could I see anything that said Bitlocker was not installed. So I relaxed. In the pub yesterday I explained to him (again) why I felt he did not need or even want to use an MS account, although I suspect he liked the idea of the extra security of Bitlocker encryption - but I don't want to have to deal with that going pear-shaped.
But today I spotted a youtube video by Rob Braxman about the risks of using W11 with an MS account, and thought 'ah, I could send this to Terry to show him it is not just I that doesn't like them'. But on viewing it, I became a bit concerned with Rob's warning about doing just what I had done: installing with a MS acct, then using local ones. I don't really care if some TPM credential info is stored on my account (that can't hurt my friend AFAICT), but would like to know if anyone here thinks it would be worth following RB's advice and, at least, resetting the TPM. I certainly don't relish the thought of the recommended step for W11 of re-installing from scratch using the 'Rufus' method.
Any thoughts? Ta, Martin
I removed Copilot & OneDrive, and set him up with local backup (files and imaging).
More recently I read that Bitlocker may have been installed automatically - a worrying prospect, when I have no idea what the encryption key might be. So when I was last with him I checked, and could find no sign of it - although neither could I see anything that said Bitlocker was not installed. So I relaxed. In the pub yesterday I explained to him (again) why I felt he did not need or even want to use an MS account, although I suspect he liked the idea of the extra security of Bitlocker encryption - but I don't want to have to deal with that going pear-shaped.
But today I spotted a youtube video by Rob Braxman about the risks of using W11 with an MS account, and thought 'ah, I could send this to Terry to show him it is not just I that doesn't like them'. But on viewing it, I became a bit concerned with Rob's warning about doing just what I had done: installing with a MS acct, then using local ones. I don't really care if some TPM credential info is stored on my account (that can't hurt my friend AFAICT), but would like to know if anyone here thinks it would be worth following RB's advice and, at least, resetting the TPM. I certainly don't relish the thought of the recommended step for W11 of re-installing from scratch using the 'Rufus' method.
Any thoughts? Ta, Martin
My Computers
System One System Two
-
- OS
- W10
- Computer type
- PC/Desktop
- Manufacturer/Model
- Home brew
- CPU
- Ryzen3-2200G
- Motherboard
- GA-A320M-S2H
- Memory
- 16 GB Kingston HyperX DDR4
- Graphics Card(s)
- Integrated
- Sound Card
- Integrated
- Monitor(s) Displays
- LG W2246
- Screen Resolution
- 1920x1080
- Hard Drives
- Intel 760p 256GB NVMe M.2
Seagate Barracuda 7200 1TB
Gash Seagate ST31608
- PSU
- 2006-vintage no-name
- Case
- Acer Aspire 2006
- Cooling
- Air (fan-assist)
- Keyboard
- HP SK-2885
- Mouse
- wireless
- Internet Speed
- 32 mbps
- Browser
- FF latest
- Antivirus
- MS Defender
-
- Operating System
- W10
- Computer type
- Laptop
- Manufacturer/Model
- HP 255 G8
- CPU
- Ryzen 5 3500U
- Memory
- 8 GB
- Graphics card(s)
- on-board
- Monitor(s) Displays
- 16"
- Screen Resolution
- 1920x1080
- Hard Drives
- Samsung SSD 512GB Nvme
- Browser
- FF + Edge
- Antivirus
- MS Defender





