Should I disable IPv6 or not?


@cheaterslick
You can measure the difference in a few ms ipv6 VS ipv4. But you will never notice the difference yourself.
The only time you can notice the difference if something is temporary overloaded or some NAT rule that acts up.
and that ipv6 do not go over NAT and can gain a few ms that way. But your speed internet speed will still be identical.

So will you notice ipv4 VS ipv6 over wireguard. If you do a speed test and look at the number becoming 1-4% lower ms.. so on 100ms you can lower it to 96ms. So you can see it.. but can you notice a 4ms difference IRL. :-) :-)
 

My Computers

System One System Two

  • OS
    Linux: Debian, Kali-linux, Alma, Win: 7, 8.1,2012R
    Manufacturer/Model
    HP Elitebook 840, AsusX53, Aspire E1-572. AsusUX32A, HP Pro3130mt+3010mt, HP Proliant ML150, 3xCustom-PC, i3, i5, i7
    CPU
    i3, i5 and i7 From 2gen to 9th gen... Server dual Xenon
    Hard Drives
    Sata, M.2, SAS
  • Operating System
    Retro: 2003server.XPpro, Win2000, Win98SE, Win95, Win3.11, MS-DOS, IBM-DOS
    Manufacturer/Model
    Commodore, AST, Fujitsu, Compaq, etc etc. etc Around 15 desktops and 20 laptops in the collection
    CPU
    Oldest intel 8088 up to P4 dual core
    Hard Drives
    MFM, IDE, SCSI
Facebook has ipv4 as i can open facebook.com
So they as many has both ipv4 and ipv6
But websites with only ipv6 is rare.. small niche sites might have, but i have not run in to any website yet that dont have ipv4
The problem is that the number of available IP addresses mathematically available on IPv4 is running out -- rather like phone numbers on old exchanges -- and these days there are more and more new web sites etc coming on stream so a new system needed to be introduced. So eventually some sites will only be available via IPv6. No conspiracy, govt data hacks , other scams / hacks here. Just plain simple boring elementary mathematics (and IPv6 in any case has better secure protocols too -- why not if a new addressing system comes into play add extra security too).

Cheers
jimbo
 

My Computer

System One

  • OS
    Windows XP,11 Linux Fedora Rawhide pre-release 45
    Computer type
    PC/Desktop
    CPU
    2 X Intel i7
    Screen Resolution
    4KUHD X 2
Thing is I'm thinking about switching my protocol to using WireGuard and that WireGuard (correct me if I'm wrong) utilizes IPv6 to work more effectively. I haven't fully decided to do that yet. That's why I'm looking for feedback.

Unless you all know that WireGuard uses IPv4 just as effectively as anything else..

😅
That makes no sense. If WireGuard uses IPv6, why are you posting asking if you should disable it? This whole thread doesn't ring true.

Bottom line, leave everything alone and move on.
 

My Computer

System One

  • OS
    W11
    Computer type
    PC/Desktop
    Manufacturer/Model
    2 HP Desktops, 1 Dell Desktop, 2 Dell XPS Laptops, 1 HP Laptop
    Keyboard
    Logitech
    Mouse
    Logitech MX Master 4 & 3
    Internet Speed
    500 mps
    Browser
    Firefox
    Antivirus
    Bitdefender
That makes no sense. If WireGuard uses IPv6, why are you posting asking if you should disable it? This whole thread doesn't ring true.

Bottom line, leave everything alone and move on.

Good point. WireGuard uses peer to peer so keeping IPv6 enabled should make it a bit faster it would seem.
 

My Computer

System One

  • OS
    11 Pro 25H2
    Computer type
    Laptop
    Manufacturer/Model
    MSI
    CPU
    i7-10750H
    Motherboard
    MSI MS-17F5
    Memory
    16GB Samsung DDR4 3200
    Graphics Card(s)
    Intel + Nvidia RTX3060 Laptop
    Sound Card
    Realtek
    Monitor(s) Displays
    Samsung 24" Curved (HDMI)
    Screen Resolution
    1920x1080
    Hard Drives
    Sabrent Rocket Gen3 1Tb Smasung EVO 870 1TB
    Antivirus
    Bitdefender
That makes no sense. If WireGuard uses IPv6, why are you posting asking if you should disable it? This whole thread doesn't ring true.

Well it rings true to me. I wouldn't be asking it, otherwise.

And because I haven't decided whether to switch and use WireGuard or not, with IPv6 privacy being one of the (but not the only) determining factors. That's what got me to thinking about the subject of using IPv6 in the first place.

I want to weigh both options. Better streaming (say, for example, use of WireGuard) vs. privacy (leaving IPv6 disabled). If the risks outweigh any benefits then I'll leave it as is.

~

That being said, going back to a previous question

"That said, some users worry about IPv6 tracking risks and its impact on their online anonymity. There is some basis for this concern: unlike IPv4, which often uses shared or dynamic addresses, IPv6 can assign unique, persistent identifiers to devices, which in theory could make tracking easier. However, most modern systems use privacy extensions that generate temporary, randomized IPv6 addresses to avoid this issue."

Again, what "privacy extensions" are they talking about?

Thanks
 
Last edited:

My Computers

System One System Two

  • OS
    Windows 11 Pro 25H2 build: (26200.7623)
    Computer type
    Laptop
    Manufacturer/Model
    Microsoft Surface Pro
    Memory
    32GB
  • Operating System
    Microsoft 25H2 Pro
    Computer type
    Laptop
    Manufacturer/Model
    Dell Pro 14 - PC14250
    CPU
    Intel Core Ultra 7
    Memory
    64GB
    Graphics card(s)
    Intel Integrated Graphics
    Hard Drives
    Micron 1TB SSD

My Computers

System One System Two

  • OS
    Debian Trixie KDE Windows 11 Home
    Computer type
    PC/Desktop
    Manufacturer/Model
    HP 24" AiO
    CPU
    Ryzen 7 5825u
    Motherboard
    HP
    Memory
    64GB DDR4 3200
    Graphics Card(s)
    Ryzen 7 5825u
    Sound Card
    RealTek
    Monitor(s) Displays
    24" HP AiO
    Screen Resolution
    1920 x 1080 @60 Hz
    Hard Drives
    1TB WD Blue SN580 M2 SSD Partitioned.
    2x 1TB USB HDD External Backup/Storage.
    PSU
    90W external power brick
    Case
    24" All in One
    Cooling
    Default Air Cooling
    Keyboard
    HP WiFi UK extended
    Mouse
    HP WiFi 3 Button
    Internet Speed
    1GB full fibre
    Browser
    Edge & Firefox
    Antivirus
    AVG Internet Security/Windows Defender
    Other Info
    Mainly Open Source Software
  • Operating System
    Ubuntu 22.04.5 LTS
    Computer type
    Laptop
    Manufacturer/Model
    Dell 13" Latitude 2017
    CPU
    i5 7200u
    Motherboard
    Dell
    Memory
    16GB DDR4
    Graphics card(s)
    Intel
    Sound Card
    Intel
    Monitor(s) Displays
    13" Dell Laptop
    Hard Drives
    250GB Crucial 2.5" SSD
    Mouse
    Generic WiFi 3 button
    Internet Speed
    WiFi only
    Browser
    Firefox
    Antivirus
    ClamAV TK
    Other Info
    Mainly Open Source Software

My Computers

System One System Two

  • OS
    Windows 11 Pro 25H2
    Computer type
    PC/Desktop
    Manufacturer/Model
    PowerSpec B746
    CPU
    Intel Core i7-10700K
    Motherboard
    ASRock Z490 Phantom Gaming 4/ax
    Memory
    16GB (8GB PC4-19200 DDR4 SDRAM x2)
    Graphics Card(s)
    NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 TI
    Sound Card
    Realtek Audio
    Monitor(s) Displays
    #1. LG ULTRAWIDE 34" #2. AOC Q32G2WG3 32"
    Screen Resolution
    #1. 3440 X 1440 #2. 1920 x 1080
    Hard Drives
    NVMe WDC WDS100T2B0C-00PXH0 1TB
    Samsung SSD 860 EVO 1TB
    PSU
    750 Watts (62.5A)
    Case
    PowerSpec/Lian Li ATX 205
    Keyboard
    Logitech K270
    Mouse
    Logitech M185
    Browser
    Microsoft Edge and Firefox
    Antivirus
    Webroot SecureAnywhere CE 26.1
  • Operating System
    Windows 11 Canary Channel
    Computer type
    PC/Desktop
    Manufacturer/Model
    PowerSpec G156
    CPU
    Intel Core i5-8400 CPU @ 2.80GHz
    Motherboard
    AsusTeK Prime B360M-A
    Memory
    16 MB DDR 4-2666
    Monitor(s) Displays
    23" Speptre HDMI 75Hz
    Screen Resolution
    1920x1080
    Hard Drives
    Samsung 970 EVO 500GB NVMe
    Keyboard
    Logitek K270
    Mouse
    Logitek M185
    Browser
    Firefox, Edge and Edge Canary
    Antivirus
    Windows Defender
this may help explain but if you going to use a VPN or Cloudflare Warp
then that is all done at their DNS server end.

best of luck Steve ..

Windows 10/11 and Windows Server​


Windows supports randomized interface identifiers and temporary addresses; PowerShell is the authoritative interface for persistent changes, while netsh remains useful for inspection and quick toggles.
  • Show current global IPv6 protocol settings: Get-NetIPv6Protocol | Format-List
  • Enable randomized IIDs and temporary addresses persistently: Set-NetIPv6Protocol -RandomizeIdentifiers Enabled -UseTemporaryAddresses Enabled
  • Classic netsh toggle: netsh interface ipv6 set privacy state=enabled
  • Inspect privacy status: netsh interface ipv6 show privacy
  • List addresses and spot temporary ones: Get-NetIPAddress -AddressFamily IPv6 | Where-Object SuffixOrigin -eq 'Random'

If you run services bound to a specific address, bind them to your non-temporary or to a stable per-subnet address while keeping temporary addresses for browsers and other client processes.

That's what I'm looking for. I will quote it here in case anybody else is interested in it in the future

I appreciate that link & thanks. :-)(y)
 

My Computers

System One System Two

  • OS
    Windows 11 Pro 25H2 build: (26200.7623)
    Computer type
    Laptop
    Manufacturer/Model
    Microsoft Surface Pro
    Memory
    32GB
  • Operating System
    Microsoft 25H2 Pro
    Computer type
    Laptop
    Manufacturer/Model
    Dell Pro 14 - PC14250
    CPU
    Intel Core Ultra 7
    Memory
    64GB
    Graphics card(s)
    Intel Integrated Graphics
    Hard Drives
    Micron 1TB SSD
The problem is that the number of available IP addresses mathematically available on IPv4 is running out -- rather like phone numbers on old exchanges -- and these days there are more and more new web sites etc coming on stream so a new system needed to be introduced. So eventually some sites will only be available via IPv6. No conspiracy, govt data hacks , other scams / hacks here. Just plain simple boring elementary mathematics (and IPv6 in any case has better secure protocols too -- why not if a new addressing system comes into play add extra security too).

Cheers
jimbo
I know all that. :-) And that is why a lot of ISP's using CG-NAT to get more users over the same IP in the same way as VPN does.
and also cloudflare running more webbservers over the same front IP as it also minimize ddos attacks on a specific website.
So ipv4 and NAT has a lot more pros then cons.
 

My Computers

System One System Two

  • OS
    Linux: Debian, Kali-linux, Alma, Win: 7, 8.1,2012R
    Manufacturer/Model
    HP Elitebook 840, AsusX53, Aspire E1-572. AsusUX32A, HP Pro3130mt+3010mt, HP Proliant ML150, 3xCustom-PC, i3, i5, i7
    CPU
    i3, i5 and i7 From 2gen to 9th gen... Server dual Xenon
    Hard Drives
    Sata, M.2, SAS
  • Operating System
    Retro: 2003server.XPpro, Win2000, Win98SE, Win95, Win3.11, MS-DOS, IBM-DOS
    Manufacturer/Model
    Commodore, AST, Fujitsu, Compaq, etc etc. etc Around 15 desktops and 20 laptops in the collection
    CPU
    Oldest intel 8088 up to P4 dual core
    Hard Drives
    MFM, IDE, SCSI

Latest Support Threads

Back
Top Bottom