I have 6 monitors. If I game, I only use one dedicated monitor. There is a plausible advantage to these. I have only briefly looked at them since you posted this, previously I knew nothing about them.
I have a neat cable setup but it would still be nicer having 1 cable (for gaming) as apposed to 6 cables in total.
Until I update my monitors, my only concern is that I currently need special HDMI to Display Port cables to make the video card and monitors respond to each other.
Hi there
(Tx=Transmitter and Rx receiver in this post) !!.
@antspants
Works also if you connect the display port to HDMI e.g computer->display port>HDMI>Tx etc -- but if you do that you'll still need an HDMI connection for the Rx at the monitor end -- maybe it would work with another HDMI->display port at the monitor end - provided the HDMI is bi-directional i.e both input and output signals accepted as the computer has outbound HDMI and the monitor obviously needs an inbound signal.
I've just tested it with a computer having a display port as its GPU so : ->display port ->HDMI->Tx->Rx->HDMI port on monitor Most monitors have HDMI ports -- not sure what would happen if the Rx is connected to the HDMI end of an HDMI-> display port connector which goes into the device -- you are on your own on that set up !!!.
The range of these - even for the el cheapo model is further than the range of wireless keyboard and mouse so the advantage is you can have access to your computer anywhere you have a screen with the Rx (Receiver) plugged into its HDMI port without ANY cabling -- just a small USB 5V power supply (and a lot of modern TV's have a 5V powered port anyway so you might not even need the power supply.
The spec implies max range of around 50 metres - but that depends on your building etc. Also being RFCOMM Blu Tooth powered instead of infra red you don't need the Tx and Rx to be in visible site of each other which is a problem with some TV remotes of course.
Not sure why this type of device isn't more known about -- especially as loads more people are using Mini PC's where 3 thick HDMI cables however neatly you have the cables is still awkward and of course it means your computer is tethered to a monitor via a cable.
I only thought about these when I was reading about Intel's wireless display -- that's another who;e area of complication -- seems the HDMI Rx and Tx pair is by far the better solution -- not much info around though on these -- and as I'm not a gamer have no idea if this type of device is suitable -- no trouble though with 4k UHD monitors.
I'm 100% happy with my initial testing of this device -- the original aim was to replace 2 aging HP proliant gen 8 server machines I'm using for NAS boxes with 2X mini PC's. So far so good -- one box already on its way to the tip -- far too old to be of any use to give away. !!!
Cheers
jimbo