Solved Performance Monitor

Have not tried this in awhile, but showing warnings which is odd to me because i notice no issues in performance and regularly maintain everything for peek performance.


TRY THIS OKAY

Task manager ,so not sure why reporting these warnings. Done other test like stress tests they are fine.



Maybe because of high resolution 4K, HDR settings are on. But if look at task manager afterwards up here.

Did a test with Passmark here is results

Two more

Those warnings are based on what?
For example your CPU is more than capable of running Windows 11 and your apps, games etc. But if Microsofts base line for performance is an i9 12xxxx then your CPU is performing below expectations.
The same with your GPU, an RTX3060Ti is a powerful graphics card more than capable of a 4K HDR display, depending on load, but when compared to an RTX3090Ti it is performing terribly.
As it stands your results are pointless if you have nothing to base the results on in comparison, the only thing that is useful are warnings about devices or drivers being disabled that you are unaware of or hardware failing basic functionality tests, which do not seem to be an issue here.

Anything else i can try ?

DigitalGoat said:

Those warnings are based on what?
For example your CPU is more than capable of running Windows 11 and your apps, games etc. But if Microsofts base line for performance is an i9 12xxxx then your CPU is performing below expectations.
The same with your GPU, an RTX3060Ti is a powerful graphics card more than capable of a 4K HDR display, depending on load, but when compared to an RTX3090Ti it is performing terribly.
As it stands your results are pointless if you have nothing to base the results on in comparison, the only thing that is useful are warnings about devices or drivers being disabled that you are unaware of or hardware failing basic functionality tests, which do not seem to be an issue here.

Click to expand...

Not sure understanding your exact point. That Microsoft standards are high ?

Guess why i ran Passmark it bases it on comparison to others.

PassMark Rating
#1 - Z370 HD3-CF 7133
#2 - GA-990FXA-UD3 2506
#3 - H97M-D3H 1866
#4 - X570 AORUS MASTER 7173
#5 - PRIME X299-A 4868
#6 - 20JACTO1WW 3239
#7 - PRIME X399-A 6517
This Computer 7520

CPU Mark
#1 - Intel Core i7-8700K @ 3.70GHz 14329
#2 - AMD FX-8120 Eight-Core 4853
#3 - Intel Core i3-4160 @ 3.60GHz 3746
#4 - AMD Ryzen 9 3900 12-Core 30956
#5 - Intel Core i9-7900X @ 3.30GHz 20734
#6 - Intel Core i7-7700HQ @ 2.80GHz 7438
#7 - AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1950X 16-Core 26039
This Computer 20124

2D Graphics Mark
#1 - NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 1038
#2 - NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 3GB 423.7
#3 - Intel(R) HD Graphics 4400 365.1
#4 - AMD Radeon R9 380 885
#5 - Radeon RX 560 Series 644
#6 - NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Mobile) 365.2
#7 - AMD Radeon RX 580 793
This Computer 880

3D Graphics Mark
#1 - NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 16171
#2 - NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 3GB 7375
#3 - Intel(R) HD Graphics 4400 539
#4 - AMD Radeon R9 380 6523
#5 - Radeon RX 560 Series 4441
#6 - NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Mobile) 6128
#7 - AMD Radeon RX 580 9391
This Computer 23259

Memory Mark
#1 - 32GB DDR4 SDRAM PC4-19207 Kingston 3379
#2 - 8GB DDR3 SDRAM PC3-12800 Corsair 1377
#3 - 8GB DDR3 SDRAM PC3-12800 Kingston 1980
#4 - 16GB DDR4 SDRAM PC4-25600 G Skill Intl 3272
#5 - 16GB DDR4 SDRAM PC4-25600 G Skill Intl 2629
#6 - 16GB DDR4 SDRAM PC4-19200 SK Hynix 2761
#7 - 64GB DDR4 SDRAM PC4-21333 Corsair 2711
This Computer 4025

Disk Mark
#1 - Samsung SSD 960 EVO 1TB (1TB) 20747
#2 - INTEL SSDSC2BW120A4 (120GB) 2250
#3 - INTEL SSDSC2CW240A3 (240GB) 4871
#4 - WDS500G2X0C-00L350 (500GB) 23499
#5 - Samsung SSD 850 PRO 512GB (512GB) 5374
#6 - INTEL SSDPEKKF256G7L (256GB) 8291
#7 - Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 1TB (1TB) 27727
This Computer 25111

So should i forget what Performance monitor says ? See when tests were done i was at low idle.
Or maybe i am looking for something that is not a worry

My post was about your first post, the Performance Monitor results, the warnings you refered to are pretty meaningless as you don't have a baseline to compare to and are pretty vague in the conclusions.
As long as there are no hardware or driver related failures listed then you do not need to worry.

The Passmark results are more informative simply because you can compare your system to an identical or almost identical system as far as performance is concerned.

Personally when benchmarking system performance I would use Cinebench, 3D Mark and something like Unigenes Superposition and/ or Heaven benchmarks. The reason being that some benchmark tools have been found to be less than unbias depending on the architecture in use where those I mentioned are used by the majority of reviewers and as far as is known have no inherent bias.
As long as your system performs within margin of error compared to a very similar system running the same OS version, settings, display and using the same benchmark tools then I don't see an issue.

I didn't come close to post 2 or 3 running Passmark. Yet my system does everything I need it to do. "See My Specs" Is your system having issues? Are you having a problem that you need help fixing? If not then this post should be moved to the appropriate forum section. This is all about bragging rights. IMO. Your hardware can only give what it has. No more.

Lance1 said:

I didn't come close to post 2 or 3 running Passmark. Yet my system does everything I need it to do. "See My Specs" Is your system having issues? Are you having a problem that you need help fixing? If not then this post should be moved to the appropriate forum section. This is all about bragging rights. IMO. Your hardware can only give what it has. No more.

Click to expand...

This thread is not about bragging rights, it is about the results of the performance monitor warning the OP that his components are under performing. The OP was obviously concerned and was asking opinions and providing information related to thier query.

DigitalGoat said:

My post was about your first post, the Performance Monitor results, the warnings you refered to are pretty meaningless as you don't have a baseline to compare to and are pretty vague in the conclusions.
As long as there are no hardware or driver related failures listed then you do not need to worry.

The Passmark results are more informative simply because you can compare your system to an identical or almost identical system as far as performance is concerned.

Personally when benchmarking system performance I would use Cinebench, 3D Mark and something like Unigenes Superposition and/ or Heaven benchmarks. The reason being that some benchmark tools have been found to be less than unbias depending on the architecture in use where those I mentioned are used by the majority of reviewers and as far as is known have no inherent bias.
As long as your system performs within margin of error compared to a very similar system running the same OS version, settings, display and using the same benchmark tools then I don't see an issue.

Click to expand...

Thanks for better explanation ! Not worried just bit confused on warnings in performance monitor as it never showed it in the past with say other systems i built or possibly even this as some components are new.

Do have an issue been happening randomly, but not many replies in the time it has been posted.
Freezes then restarts nvlddmkm.sys

It is possible that Windows component updates and/ or vendor driver updates have moved the goal posts over time on that system if you haven't seen those 'warnings' before, but as I said, as long as it doesn't list actual test failures or hardware faults you don't need to be concerned.
I will check your other thread, see if anything occurs to me.

DigitalGoat said:

It is possible that Windows component updates and/ or vendor driver updates have moved the goal posts over time on that system if you haven't seen those 'warnings' before, but as I said, as long as it doesn't list actual test failures or hardware faults you don't need to be concerned.
I will check your other thread, see if anything occurs to me.

Click to expand...

Thanks ! May try some other ones you mentioned 3D Mark or Cinebench.