I was just making a joke about people having a choice, then the world would end

I am all about having a choice... the choice to have privacy or not.. that should be up to the user to chose, not to the company.
This is why i so often bash out on Microsoft, Google, Facebook, Apple..
When they have monopoly and the only choice they give the user is.. accept no privacy or dont use our product.. That is abuse of power.
Facebook is easy to avoid as you dont really need that platform.. But the other three more or less has the monopoly on OS's for smartphones, tablets and computers.
Linux and degoogled android phones do exist.. but then you cant log in to a bank or you cant have some software as they only is made for Windows/Google-Android/MacOS/iOS..
So as Microsoft, Google and Apple have monopoly and their user-terms is.. accept no privacy or dont use our products.. then its just wrong
I'm forced to use Windows for three things.. and as win10/11 home/pro sucks on privacy and all tweaks for it get thrown out the window on every H version uproll, then LTSC is the only choice as that one can be made in to privacy.. but as microsoft have said we dont sell LTSC to normal customers. only to business via volume licences only.
Then i think Microsoft have made it morally right for us users that want privacy to use LTSC without valid licence key.
I will change this opinion that day Microsoft let normal people buy an LTSC key for one computer and not only business volume licenses.
as for LG-smart TV..
for a non-tech.. dont hook it up to internet, use chromcast box or apple-TV box to the HDMI port...
for those who are tech savvy... open the TV and remove the microphones, or set up a firewall or a pi-hole to block unwanted internet connections.
Even if a device is a spyware.. if it can't phone home, it can't spy on you.