On this computer there are hundreds of open webpages and no special applications in use:
Installed Physical Memory (RAM) 32.0 GB
Total Physical Memory 31.9 GB
Available Physical Memory 7.34 GB
Total Virtual Memory 61.4 GB
Available Virtual Memory 1.38 GB
Page File Space 29.5 GB
Edge: 242
Chrome: 188
Duck Duck Go: 19
Opera: 30
The tabs must be working, otherwise they don't matter. I "store" like 20-40 open tabs in my browsers, but if you don't click them it's the same as storing them as favourites. My memory problems told above came after opening some news site (with like 30 idle tabs of assorted sites that don't matter), and opening several (10-20) links from this page in new tabs at the same time, maybe navigating a bit in the original tab too, making a "selection" of news to read and closing them afterwards one by one. This is totally inefficient in memory and resources in general. Some pages are much heavier than others, forum pages use to be among the least demanding.
This is a quite light load in the computer I'm using now (I've done a Google search with 3-4 open pages in 2 tabs, now closed, and I have opened 3 new elevenforum.com tabs. The "Commit (GB)" line is the important one. The 7 GB must not surpass the memory capacity, RAM + free C: space (this C: has 190 GB free) or lower limit if set.
--------------------------------------
I've read things like "the more RAM, the more evictions and the more pagefile" but I don't understand it. RAM as a factory that produces memory content, lol. Neither with 64 MB RAM (very old computers) nor with 64 GB (some current high-end ones).
Decades ago (families used to be bigger) the car roof racks were common here in vacation season, not only to carry big objects like bicycles, but also for part of the ordinary luggage, not optimal but if the car and its trunk aren't big enough... What I would never understand is that the bigger the trunk, the more luggage in the roof rack (essentially all cars here, either from decades ago or currently, can carry up to 4-5 people regardless of the car size). A situation in which the luggage in the roof raises with the trunk size could end up in small cars not needing roof rack at all and bigger cars having single, double, triple, quadruple height etc roof racks as the car size increases, but carrying just more suitcases and bags (for the same number of people), not say a small boat or golf car (that would be proportional to the statistical economic capacity of a bigger car's owner, and hence logical, disclaimer: I suppose this isn't legal or at least it isn't advisable lol).