- Local time
- 9:38 AM
- Posts
- 1,953
- OS
- W10 and Insider Dev.+ Linux Mint
Problem with TDP quoted by Intel is it's for idle/low power usage mode and those 205W are electrical power consumption while it doesn't scale linearly to TDP. TDP is more of an indication of efficiency and newer Intel CPUs have those "Efficient" cores that improve efficiency even at higher loads so losses as indicated by TDP are not as great as they could be.I agree with you both, 65w tdp is what is usually quoted, i just felt if youd added tdp like you were meaning then id have understood and not then went on to say that it uses over 65w under load which it does, the way things are written dictate what they mean is all. I got you though no arguments from my side, Just mis-understood the way you were writing, I would for example say my 10700k is 95w TDP but is capable of using up to 205w stock, More with OC. Just to get the full picture is all. Enjoy you're golf! Im gonna go do some myself, Got the masters to play at augusta! 2nd season so hopefully do better than last and get the win!
My Computer
System One
-
- OS
- W10 and Insider Dev.+ Linux Mint
- Computer type
- PC/Desktop
- Manufacturer/Model
- Home brewed
- CPU
- AMD Ryzen 9 7900x
- Motherboard
- ASROCK b650 PRO RS
- Memory
- 2x8GB Kingston 6000MHz, Cl 32 @ 6200MHz Cl30
- Graphics Card(s)
- Gigabyte Rx 6600XT Gaming OC 8G Pro
- Sound Card
- MB, Realtek Ac1220p
- Monitor(s) Displays
- 3 x 27"
- Screen Resolution
- 1080p
- Hard Drives
- Kingston KC3000. 1TBSamsung 970 evo Plus 500GB, Crucial P1 NVMe 1TB, Lexar NVMe 2 TB, Silicon Power M.2 SATA 500GB
- PSU
- Seasonic 750W
- Case
- Custom Raidmax
- Cooling
- Arctic Liquid Freezer III 360mm
- Internet Speed
- 20/19 mbps