Has anyone recently looked at their DISM RestoreHealth logs? I did a Win 11 baseline update yesterday on one of my client's machines and just on a whim I ran SFC/scannow after the update and was presented with the fact there were corrupted files. Research indicates SFC makes whatever corrections it does from a local repository so I ran it and it said it could not fix the corrupted files. I then ran both DISM/ScanHealth and DISM/CheckHealth and was informed that the image was "repairable". Now comes the fun part. I ran DISM/RestoreHealth and as expected it sat at 62.3% for the better part of an hour while windows attempted to download and replace corrupted packages. At the end of the hour (or so) I was informed the image could not be repaired because one or more package sources could not be found. Apparently DISM tries to find the sources in a "catalog" somewhere and if it can't find it, it reverts to Windows Update where, it still could not find the replacement packages. (this puzzles me). Examination of the log showed numerous source corruptions and/or the inability to identify the replacement source packages.
So, today I did a "reset/restore" which reloaded windows (with the loss of apps etc. which I had to restore) and re-ran SFC/scannow ScanHealth, and CheckHealth, all of which indicated the baseline was good with no corruptions. After restoring apps and user-settings etc, I again checked the baseline which showed everything was OK. Then I noticed there was a Windows update in the queue (presumably the one that I done done earlier, I didn't notice the number). When that was done, again I re-ran ScanHealth/CheckHealth and yup, I was told the system was "repairable". I re-ran RestoreHealth...again and same thing happened. Sticks at 62.3% while it downloads and tries to replace corrupted packages. This time it only took about 30 minutes, and this time it reported everything was fixed. I ran the system file checker which reported no corruptions. Just to make sure, I checked the DISM log and there was a plethora of errors reported on corrupted source packages from both the catalog source and the WU source.
I'm certainly no expert on the methodology Microsoft uses to "restore" corrupted user files or packages, but in the past the both the CBS (SFC) logs and the DISM logs were comfortably boring, which I guess is a good thing, but not these. When I see references to corrupted "source" packages that gives me some cause for concern.
At this point, I really have no idea what the level of corruption may exist on my client's computer given the verbiage in the log. I'm a little leery of the health of the baseline given this recent behavior.
I've attached the latest log (which overwrote the others) so if someone want to wade through it and do some investigation into what might be happening I'd appreciate it.
Thanks,
Jabiru
So, today I did a "reset/restore" which reloaded windows (with the loss of apps etc. which I had to restore) and re-ran SFC/scannow ScanHealth, and CheckHealth, all of which indicated the baseline was good with no corruptions. After restoring apps and user-settings etc, I again checked the baseline which showed everything was OK. Then I noticed there was a Windows update in the queue (presumably the one that I done done earlier, I didn't notice the number). When that was done, again I re-ran ScanHealth/CheckHealth and yup, I was told the system was "repairable". I re-ran RestoreHealth...again and same thing happened. Sticks at 62.3% while it downloads and tries to replace corrupted packages. This time it only took about 30 minutes, and this time it reported everything was fixed. I ran the system file checker which reported no corruptions. Just to make sure, I checked the DISM log and there was a plethora of errors reported on corrupted source packages from both the catalog source and the WU source.
I'm certainly no expert on the methodology Microsoft uses to "restore" corrupted user files or packages, but in the past the both the CBS (SFC) logs and the DISM logs were comfortably boring, which I guess is a good thing, but not these. When I see references to corrupted "source" packages that gives me some cause for concern.
At this point, I really have no idea what the level of corruption may exist on my client's computer given the verbiage in the log. I'm a little leery of the health of the baseline given this recent behavior.
I've attached the latest log (which overwrote the others) so if someone want to wade through it and do some investigation into what might be happening I'd appreciate it.
Thanks,
Jabiru
- Windows Build/Version
- Win 11/24H2 Build 26100.4770
Attachments
My Computers
System One System Two
-
- OS
- Host: Windows 11 Pro 24H2
- Computer type
- PC/Desktop
- Manufacturer/Model
- Custom User Build
- CPU
- AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX
- Motherboard
- Minisforum BD795i SE
- Memory
- 2X 16GB DDR5-5200MTs (32GB)
- Graphics Card(s)
- AMD Radeon Pro WX5100 Workstation
- Sound Card
- Integrated AMD High Definition Audio CODEC
- Monitor(s) Displays
- 2X LG 32UN880-A
- Screen Resolution
- 3840x2160
- Hard Drives
- 2X NVMe 1TB SSDs
- PSU
- Corsair SF450
- Case
- Fractal Design Terra
- Cooling
- Noctua FS-A12
- Keyboard
- Logitech K270 KB/Mouse Combo
- Mouse
- Logitech K270 KB/Mouse Combo
- Internet Speed
- 800Mb
- Browser
- Firefox, Edge, Edge Chromium
- Antivirus
- MalwareBytes, MS Defender
- Other Info
- 2x Seagate 2TB external USB HDD, 1x 5TB external USB WD Passport HDD, 1x externql USB WD SATA 1TB Green SATA SSD
-
- Operating System
- Windows 11 Home
- Computer type
- Laptop
- Manufacturer/Model
- Acer Swift 3 SF314-42 R3U5
- CPU
- Ryzen 7 4700U @ 2GHz-->4.2GHz Boost
- Motherboard
- RO Kona_RN
- Memory
- 16GB LPD DDR4X
- Graphics card(s)
- AMD Radeon (Renoir) Vega
- Sound Card
- ATI/AMD Renoir/Van Gough/Cezanne/Rembrandt HD Audio Controller
- Monitor(s) Displays
- IPS LCD Integrated Chi Mei CMN14D4
- Screen Resolution
- 1920x1080
- Hard Drives
- Hynix 512GB NVMe (PCIe 4.0)
- PSU
- Ext 19v
- Case
- Integrated Magnesium
- Cooling
- Therm internal fan
- Keyboard
- Integrated
- Mouse
- Jellycomb
- Internet Speed
- 800MB
- Browser
- Firefox, Edge Chromium
- Antivirus
- Malwarebytes, MS Defender
- Other Info
- External USB-C 1Gb Ethernet connection




